Coachmen Industries Inc et al v. Kemlite
3:2006cv00160 |
March 2, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 196 OPINION AND ORDER: Kemlite's motions to exclude the testimony of Branch Engineering & Francis Burke 140 , 142 are GRANTED. Kemlite's motion to exclude testimony of Dr Hanks 137 is DENIED. Coachmen's motion to exclude testimony of Dr Armstrong 138 is DENIED. Both Coachmen and Kemlite's motions for summary judgment 138 , 144 are DENIED. Both motions for oral argument 146 , 157 are DENIED AS MOOT. Parties are reminded that this case is set for a 2 1/2 week trial on he issues of liability to begin on 1/13/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 11/10/08. (sdf) Modified on 11/10/2008 to correct date for trial (sdf). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/10/2008: # 2 Opinion and Order) (smp). Modified on 11/12/2008 (smp). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Coachmen Industries Inc et al v. Kemlite | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.