Johnson v. Mitcheff et al
James E Johnson |
Michael A Mitcheff, Rose Vaisvilos, Lynn Frye, Karen Cummings, Matthew Hornaday, Dr Marandet, Dr Smith, Dr Knieser, Bob Burns and Dr Schleg |
3:2013cv00223 |
March 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Henry |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Robert L Miller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 77 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Michael A Mitcheff. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/15/2016 and the Jury Trial set for 9/6/2016 are VACATED. Clerk DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 7/7/16. (cer) |
Filing 37 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER granting 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Mr Johnson's amended complaint remains at issue on his claim of improper or inadequate medical care and pain medication relating to the treatment of his broken jaw. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 5/22/2014. (dk) |
Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed against Dr Michael Mitcheff in his individual capacity for monetary damages and in his official capacity for injunctive relief for denying him proper medical care in violation of the 8th Amendment; dismisses any and all other claims; directs USM to effect service. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 5/13/13. (smp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.