Property-Owners Insurance Company v. Parke et al
Property-Owners Insurance Company |
John Parke, Central Rent-A-Crane Inc and D-T Construction Services Inc |
3:2013cv00399 |
May 13, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Philip P Simon |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Property-Owners Insurance Company; DENYING 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Central Rent-A-Crane Inc and DENYING AS MOOT 66 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike Portions of the Affidavit of Rashelle Bollinger by Defendant Central Rent-A-Crane Inc. Property-Owners is entitled to a DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT CENTRAL RENT-A-CRANE, INC. stating that at this time Property-Owners o wes no duty to defend or indemnify Central Rent-A-Crane, Inc. Claims against D-T must be DISMISSED FOR LACK OF STANDING to sue D-T. Defendant John Parke will be DISMISSED as a party. Since there are no remaining claims pending in this matter, judgment may now be entered in accordance with this opinion and this matter will be CLOSED.Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 9/14/2016. (lhc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.