Cashner v. Widup et al
Plaintiff: Frederick C Cashner, Jr
Defendant: John J Widup, David E Lain, Ronald Gaydos, Dr Nadir Al-Shami, Kimberly White and Advanced Correctional Healthcare
Case Number: 3:2014cv01641
Filed: June 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 77 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant John J Widup and 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Dr Nadir Al-Shami, Kimberly White; DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's federal claims; DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's state law claims; and ORDERS the clerk to enter judgment in favor of the defendants consistent with this order and close this case. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 12/21/2016. (lhc)(cc: Plaintiff)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER re 1 Pro Se Complaint. Court grants leave to proceed against Al-Shami, White and Widup in their individual capacities and dismises Party David E Lain (Sheriff, Porter County), Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Ronald Gaydos (Asst. Warden, Porter Co. Jail). Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 7/30/2014. (cc: USM)(kds)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cashner v. Widup et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick C Cashner, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John J Widup
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David E Lain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Gaydos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr Nadir Al-Shami
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Correctional Healthcare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?