1st Source Bank v. Neto et al
1st Source Bank |
Joaquim Salles Leite Neto and Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association |
3:2015cv00261 |
June 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
St. Joseph |
James T Moody |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 112 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Plaintiff 1st Source Bank. This Court enters a final judgment in favor of 1st Source Bank and against Defendants in the updated amount of $2,537,362.52 (plus interest at a per diem rate of $575.25 from February 21, 2018 to the date of judgment), plus attorney fees, costs, and expenses in the amount of $149,784.43. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 6/13/2018. (lhc) |
Filing 110 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff 1st Source Bank because 1st Source is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for breach against the Defendants and on Joaquim's counterclaim for negligent misrepresentation. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/25/2018. (lhc) |
Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER denying 72 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 2/19/17. (nal) |
Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 42 MOTION to Enjoin Plaintiff From Maintaining Its Litigation In Brazil filed by Joaquim Salles Leite Neto. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 12/12/2016. (lns) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.