Webster v. US Attorney et al
Tommy Webster |
US Attorney, R Schaffer, South Bend Police Chief and St Joseph County States Attorney |
3:2015cv00554 |
November 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 Motion for Fraud and denying 29 Giving Notice for Record of 3rd Party Interest in the Outcome of and Proceeds From Suit Settlement &/or Award. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 1/27/17. (cc: Plaintiff). (nal) |
Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER: DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE defendants U.S. Attorney and Assistant U.S. Attorney R. Schaffer; DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE the South Bend Police Chief and the St. Joseph County States Attorney; and DIRECTING the clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 1/15/2016. (lhc)(cc: Plaintiff) |
Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER: DIRECTING the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Complaint 42:1983 form and send it to Tommy Webster; GRANTING him until 1/14/2016, to file an amended complaint; and CAUTIONING him that if he does not respond by that deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice pursuant to 28:1915A because the current complaint does not state a claim. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 12/17/2015. (lhc)(cc: Forms to Pla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.