Wilburn v. State of Indiana et al
| Eric Wilburn |
| Corizon Health, Inc., W. Parnell, Dawn Nelson and Indiana State of |
| 3:2017cv00059 |
| January 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| LaPorte |
| William C Lee |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 118 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Officer Willie Parnell and against Plaintiff Eric Wilburn. However, in all other respects, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 118 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 6/9/2020. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 50 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly the Court DENIES 18 Motion for Summary Judgment on exhaustion. The Court likewise denies the plaintiffs request, made only in his response brief, for summ ary judgment in his favor on this issue. Unless the defendants elect to withdraw their exhaustion defense, it will be necessary to hold a hearing pursuant to Pavey to resolve that defense. The defendants are therefore ORDERED to file a notice within fourteen days of this order advising the Court whether they elect to withdraw their exhaustion defense or proceed with a Pavey hearing. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/7/18. (mlc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
