Johnson v Berrien County Michigan
| Samantha Johnson |
| Matthew Walls, Unknown Berrien County Michigan Sheriff Department Officer(s) One, Unknown Berrien County Michigan Sheriff Department Officer(s) Two, L Paul Bailey and Berrien County Michigan |
| 3:2019cv00106 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Samantha Johnson.(Drew, Sean) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to L Paul Bailey, Berrien County Michigan, Unknown Berrien County Michigan Sheriff Department Officer(s) One, Unknown Berrien County Michigan Sheriff Department Officer(s) Two, Matthew Walls. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (New Case) (sct) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Samantha Johnson( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3813312.), filed by Samantha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Drew, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
