Eckes et al v. Carter et al
| Jerome Derrell Robertson, Jerome Robertson and Austin Eckes |
| United States Government, Robert E Carter, Jr and U S Government |
| 3:2019cv00147 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Robert E Carter, Jr, United States Government, filed by Jerome Derrell Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(nae) |
Filing 7
ORDER STRIKING #5 Pro Se Complaint filed by Jerome Derrell Robertson, Austin Eckes, DENYING #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms filed by Austin Eckes, DENYING #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jerome Derrell Robertson, Austin Eckes. The clerk is DIRECTED to place this cause number on two blank PrisonerComplaint (INND Rev. 8/16) forms and send one copy to Austin Eckes and one copy to Jerome Derrell Robertson; The clerk is DIRECTED to place this cause number on a blank AO 240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form and send it to Austin Eckes; Austin Eckes and Jerome Derrell Robertson are GRANTED until April 18, 2019, to file a complaint on that form and resolve their filing fee status. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 3/25/19. (Copy mailed to pro se parties as directed in order)(mlc)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Deficiency to be cured by 4/18/2019, (mlc) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Austin Eckes, Jerome Derrell Robertson. (mlc) |
| Filing 5 **STRICKEN PER #7 ORDER**PRO SE COMPLAINT (unsigned) against Robert E Carter, Jr, United States Government, filed by Austin Eckes, Jerome Derrell Robertson.(mlc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2019: #1 Waiver of Service) (mlc). Modified on 3/27/2019 (rmc). |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms by Plaintiff Austin Eckes. (mlc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Jerome Derrell Robertson. (mlc) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DENYING #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jerome Derrell Robertson, Austin Eckes; GRANTING Austin Eckes and Jerome Derrell Robertson leave to file a complaint utilizing Prisoner Complaint (INND Rev. 8/16), which is available in the prison's law library; GRANTING Austin Eckes and Jerome Derrell Robertson until April 5, 2019, to file a complaint in this case and separately either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis motion accompanied by his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONING Austin Eckes and Jerome Derrell Robertson that if they do not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 3/5/19. (Copy mailed to pro se parties)(ksp)
|
| Filing 1 Plaintiff(s) MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Austin Eckes, Jerome Derrell Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae) (Returned copy with case number to plaintiffs, no IFP or filing fee received) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
