Burnett v. Kelsey et al
Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr |
J Lyttle, A. Kelsey, Kristine St. Martin and Richard Brown |
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
3:2019cv00673 |
August 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER denying #8 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/17/2019. (jat) |
Filing 11 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program (Wabash Valley) by Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr (nae) |
Filing 10 Initial Filing fee: $11.12, receipt number 3023419 (rmc) |
Filing 9 Letter from D. Burnett requesting docket sheet (Docket sheet sent) (nae) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Hearing to Appear in Person to Prove Case by Plaintiff Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr. (jat) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS the plaintiff, Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr., IDOC # 137416, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) $11.12to the clerk of this court in payment of the initial partial filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody of him toautomatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20% of the money he receives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full, DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/26/19. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 2:19-cv-00364. Original file and docket sheet received. (Returned copy with INND case number to Plaintiff) |
Filing 5 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, on August 20, 2019. (DMW) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/27/2019.] |
Filing 4 CLOSED TRANSFER to Northern District of Indiana - This action is now TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, at South Bend, Indiana. The Court will leave the pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pending for the transferee court to decide. The clerk is directed to terminate it as a motion on the docket. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/20/2019. (DMW) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/27/2019.] |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAC) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/27/2019.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DARYL BURNETT, JR. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Information). (MAC) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/27/2019.] Modified on 8/27/2019 to unterm - this is a pending motion (nae). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, A. KELSEY, J. LYTTLE, KRISTINE ST. MARTIN, filed by DARYL BURNETT, JR. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (MAC) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/27/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.