Garske et al v. Jayco, Inc.
| Randy Garske and Amy Garske |
| Jayco, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00767 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Jayco, Inc..(Gasper, Trevor) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jayco, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Thor Industries Inc for Jayco, Inc... (Gasper, Trevor) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Trevor Q Gasper on behalf of Jayco, Inc. (Gasper, Trevor) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jayco, Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (ksp) |
| Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE) (ksp) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Amy Garske, Randy Garske. Jayco, Inc. waiver sent on 9/18/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (Steuart, Scarlett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Jayco, Inc.( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4010905.), filed by Amy Garske, Randy Garske. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Steuart, Scarlett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
