Miller v. Warden
Scott E Miller |
Warden |
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
3:2019cv00901 |
October 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Robert L Miller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Short Record Sent to US Court of Appeals re #6 Notice of Appeal. No appeal fees paid. (nae) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability by Petitioner Scott E Miller. (nae) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Petitioner Scott E Miller. (nae) |
Filing 7 Docketing Statement re: #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Scott E Miller. (nae) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Clerks Judgment, #4 Order Dismissing Case by Scott E Miller. (Attachments: #1 Letter to Clerk, #2 Envelope)(nae) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (shk) |
Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER: The petition is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction and the clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr. on 11/18/2019. (shk) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Petitioner Scott E Miller. (nae) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Scott E Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae) |
Filing 1 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program (Westville) by Scott E Miller (nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.