Hardy v. Lott et al
| Marcus Hardy |
| Lieutenant Lott, Lieutenant Lasco, Sergeant Radats and Lieutenant Neal |
| 3:2019cv00956 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Letter from Marcus Hardy in response to #3 Order requesting extension of time (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nae)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING Marcus Hardy until 12/23/2019 to resolve his filing fee status and CAUTIONING Marcus Hardy that if he does not respond by that deadline this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 11/21/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas)
|
|
Filing 2
Letter from Marcus Hardy requesting additional copy of docket sheet (docket sheet sent) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nae)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Lieutenant Lasco, Lieutenant Lott, Lieutenant Neal, Sergeant Radats (INITIAL PARTIAL Filing fee $ 5.00) Receipt #3023502, filed by Marcus Hardy. (Hardy states address of prison is Indiana State Prison, complaint mailed from Wallens Ridge State Prison Big Stone Gap, VA) (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Wallens) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nae)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
