American Home Assurance Company v. Makita Corporation et al
American Home Assurance Company |
Makita Corporation of America, Makita U.S.A., Inc., Sony Energy Devices Corporation, Sony Corporation, Makita Corporation, Sony Corporation of America and Murata Manufacturing Company, Ltd |
3:2021cv00252 |
April 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Summons Issued as to Makita Corporation, Murata Manufacturing Company, Ltd, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Energy Devices Corporation. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (mlc) |
Filing 17 Proposed Summons filed by American Home Assurance Company. (Lesnick PHV, Ben) |
Filing 16 Proposed Summons filed by American Home Assurance Company. (Lesnick PHV, Ben) |
Filing 15 Proposed Summons filed by American Home Assurance Company. (Lesnick PHV, Ben) |
Filing 14 Proposed Summons filed by American Home Assurance Company. (Lesnick PHV, Ben) |
Filing 13 Proposed Summons filed by American Home Assurance Company. (Lesnick PHV, Ben) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Ben C Lesnick PHV for American Home Assurance Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 4/30/2021. (ace) |
Filing 11 Application for Attorney Ben C. Lesnick to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff American Home Assurance Company. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number 0755-4558594(Pro Hac Vice Temporary login, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Alan B McMaster PHV for American Home Assurance Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 4/27/2021. (ace) |
Filing 9 Application for Attorney Alan B. McMaster to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of American Home Assurance Company a/s/o Forest River, Inc.. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number 0755-4553723(Pro Hac Vice Temporary login, ) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Makita U.S.A., Inc..(Barton, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Makita Corporation of America.(Barton, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Makita Corporation of America re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Consent to Removal of Newly Served Defendant (Barton, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan T Barton on behalf of Makita Corporation of America, Makita U.S.A., Inc. (Barton, Jonathan) |
Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. **NEW CASE** (mrm) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Makita U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Makita Coporation for Makita U.S.A., Inc... (Williams Schnelker, Jessica) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Williams Schnelker on behalf of Makita U.S.A., Inc. (Williams Schnelker, Jessica) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4541639.) from Elkhart County Superior Court, Cause No. 20D05-2103-CT-000047, filed by Makita U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - SCA Consent to Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Mohammed Al Jakoush Affidavit, #4 Exhibit D - Letter to Makita - Sony Requesting Reimbursement, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Exhibit E - Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams Schnelker, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.