The Satellite Store, Inc. v. Zawadzki et al
| The Satellite Store, Inc. |
| Nick Zawadzki, Walmart Inc. and Wired Technologies, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00278 |
| April 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Joint MOTION to Continue Telephonic Rule 16(b) Conference, Joint MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Walmart Inc. With Prejudice by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Wells, Trevor) |
| Filing 21 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm) |
Filing 20
ORDER, Joint Proposed Discovery due by 6/21/2021. Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/29/2021 10:45 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 6/2/21. (slm)
|
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Walmart Inc.. (Wells, Trevor) |
| Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Satellite Store, Inc.. (Agostino, Frank) |
| Filing 17 Brief in Support of RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNJUST ENRICHMENT filed by The Satellite Store, Inc. (Agostino, Frank) Modified on 5/14/2021 to edit docket text (nae). |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT filed by The Satellite Store, Inc.. (Agostino, Frank) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank J Agostino on behalf of The Satellite Store, Inc. (Agostino, Frank) |
| Filing 14 Defendant's Revised ANSWER to Complaint and Other Responses by Wired Technologies, Inc., Nick Zawadzki.(Zappia, Len) |
| Filing 13 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint and Other Responses by Wired Technologies, Inc., Nick Zawadzki.(Zappia, Len) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Morris Rosen on behalf of Wired Technologies, Inc., Nick Zawadzki (Rosen, Morris) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wired Technologies, Inc.. (Zappia, Len) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Len C Zappia on behalf of Wired Technologies, Inc., Nick Zawadzki (Zappia, Len) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Danny Merril Newman, Jr on behalf of Walmart Inc. (Newman, Danny) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J Curtin on behalf of Walmart Inc. (Curtin, Daniel) |
| Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING) (jld) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Walmart Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Notice of Filing of Replacement Exhibit A to Notice of Removal) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Replacement Exhibit A to Notice of Removal))(Wells, Trevor) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Wells, Trevor) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc.. (Wells, Trevor) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Trevor W Wells on behalf of Walmart Inc. (Wells, Trevor) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4551044.), filed by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A -- State Court Complaint and Summonses, #3 Exhibit B -- State Court Docket and Other Filings, #4 Exhibit C -- Notice of Consent to Removal of Civil Action)(Wells, Trevor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
