Rice v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
Paul Rice |
Miami Correctional Facility, Indiana Department of Correction and Tera K Klutz |
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
3:2021cv00583 |
August 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Verified MOTION to Amend or Alter Judgment by Plaintiff Paul Rice. (nae) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (bas) |
Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER: The court DISMISSES this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A and DIRECTS the clerk to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/21/2021. (bas) |
Filing 8 Partial Filing fee: $ 350, receipt number 3027647 (jld) |
Filing 7 ORDER: The court DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO 240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send it to the plaintiff; GRANTS the plaintiff until 10/15/2021, to return the in forma pauperis motion properly completed and accompanied by a certified copy of his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 9/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 In Forma Pauperis Form)(lhc) Modified on 9/16/2021 (kms). |
Filing 6 Letter from Paul Rice re: issued with access at Westville Correctional Facility and filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kms) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Indiana Department of Correction, Miami Correctional Facility, Tera K Klutz, filed by Paul Rice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(kms) |
Filing 4 Letter from Paul Rice re filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kms) |
Filing 3 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Paul Rice. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (kms) |
***Amended Pleadings Deadline terminated. (kms) |
Filing 2 ORDER: The court STRIKES the complaint #1 ; DENIES the motion for a preliminary injunction #1 ; GRANTS the plaintiff to and including 9/13/2021 to file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies noted herein and either pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed forma pauperis accompanied by his trust fund ledgers for the past six months; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/11/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas) |
Filing 1 *STRICKEN pursuant to DE #2 Order dated 8/11/2021* MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Paul Rice. (No complaint, filing fee or IFP received)(Returned copy with case number to Rice) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(nae) Modified on 8/12/2021 (bas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.