Beals v. Warden
Petitioner: Kyle Beals and Kyle E Beals
Respondent: Warden
Not Classified By Court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2021cv00804
Filed: October 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 11/22/21. (ksp)
November 17, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Petitioner Kyle Beals. (nae)
November 17, 2021 Filing 6 RECEIPT of Consent to E-File, previously received from Kyle Beals. (nae)
November 8, 2021 Filing 5 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (lhc)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court DISMISSES the petition #1 pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases because the claims are untimely and unexhausted; DENIES Kyle Beals, a certificate of appealability pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 11; and DIRECTS the clerk to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 11/5/2021. (lhc)
October 21, 2021 Filing 3 Copy of docket sheet and habeas to be distributed to Kyle Beals #881294. (nae)
October 20, 2021 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kyle Beals. (No filing fee or IFP received) (nae)
October 20, 2021 Filing 1 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Kyle Beals. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beals v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kyle Beals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kyle E Beals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?