Lopez v. Jail Staff et al
Phillip Lopez, Jr |
Jail Staff and Tammy Cambell |
3:2021cv00822 |
October 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (lhc) |
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/17/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc) |
Filing 3 ORDER: The court DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) Prisoner Complaint form and Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO 240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) form and send them to Phillip Lopez, Jr.; GRANTS Phillip Lopez, Jr., until 12/2/2021 to respond to this order; and CAUTIONS him if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/28/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party with forms)(bas) |
Filing 2 (Unsigned) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Phillip Lopez, Jr. (kms) |
Filing 1 (Unsigned) PRO SE COMPLAINT against Tammy Cambell, Jail Staff, filed by Phillip Lopez, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Lopez)(kms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.