Venters v. ISP et al
| John Venters |
| ISP, IDOC and John Galipeau |
| 3:2021cv00899 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court STRIKES the complaint #1 ; DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) Prisoner Complaint form and send it to the plaintiff; GRANTS the plaintiff until January 31, 2022, to file an amended complaint as outlined herein; CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for failure to prosecute; and DIRECTS the clerk to send the plaintiff a docket sheet for this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 1/5/22. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(ksp)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff John Venters. (nae) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff John Venters. (nae) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against John Galipeau, IDOC, ISP, filed by John Venters. (Returned copy with case number to Venters)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
