Scruggs - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Pullins et al
| Christopher L Scruggs |
| T Pullins, A Watts, Galipeau, T Cornett, J Kennerk and Commissioner Robert E Carter, Jr |
| WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2022cv00120 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: The clerk is DIRECTED to stop docketing attempted violations in this case. It is sufficient for any future attempted violations to be docketed only in Scruggs v. Johnson, 3:22-CV-107-DRL-MGG. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/18/2022. (lhc)
|
|
Filing 9
Attempted violation - returned unfiled with copy of Order DE #5 . (nae)
|
|
Filing 8
Attempted violation - returned unfiled with copy of Order DE #5 . (nae)
|
|
Filing 7
Attempted violation - returned unfiled with copy of Order DE #5 . (nae)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (lhc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The court ORDERS Christopher L. Scruggs, IDOC # 957096, to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20 percent of the money he receives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $402.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk of court to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DIRECTS the clerk of court to return, unfiled, any papers filed by or on behalf of Christopher L. Scruggs (unless filed in 3:16-CV-39-JD, 3:16-CV-722-PPS-MGG, 3:17-CV-423-JD-MGG, or 3:21-CV-905-JD-MGG), except for a notice of appeal or if filed in a criminal or habeas corpus proceeding, until he has paid in full all outstanding fees and sanctions in all civil actions in any federal court; DIRECTS the clerk to note on the docket of this case any attempted filings in violation of this order; and DIRECTS the clerk to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/15/2022. (cc: Westville Inmate Trust Fund)(lhc)
|
|
Filing 4
Docket sheet and file stamped copy of complaint to be distributed to Christopher L Scruggs #957096. (Attachments: #1 File stamped copy of Complaint)(kms)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Cause Number/E-file Receipt by Plaintiff Christopher L Scruggs. (kms)
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Robert E Carter, Jr, T Cornett, Galipeau, J Kennerk, T Pullins, A Watts, filed by Christopher L Scruggs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(No filing fee or IFP received)(kms)
|
|
Filing 1
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Christopher L Scruggs. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (kms)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
