Taylor v. Gotsch
| Ezekiel I Taylor |
| Michael G Gotsch, Sr |
| 3:2022cv00725 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| John E Martin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal) |
Filing 14
ORDER: This case is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/25/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
|
| Filing 13 Mail Returned from Ezekiel I Taylor as Undeliverable - Return to Sender - Attempted - Not Known - Unable to Forward - CORT - Not at MCF - #10 Order to Show Cause. (jdb) |
| Filing 12 Mail Returned from Ezekiel I Taylor as Undeliverable - #10 Order to Show Cause,. (shk) |
| Filing 11 Mail Returned from Ezekiel I Taylor as Undeliverable - #8 Order. (shk) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff Taylor to SHOW CAUSE in writing by 10/20/2022, why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court CAUTIONS Plaintiff that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 09/30/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
| Filing 9 Mail Returned from Ezekiel I Taylor as Undeliverable - Released - Docket sheet. (kmt) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court STRIKES the Complaint #1 ; DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) Prisoner Complaint form and send it to Ezekiel I. Taylor; DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO240 (Rev. 7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send it to Ezekiel I Taylor; GRANTS Plaintiff Ezekiel I. Taylor until 10/31/2022, to either pay the filing fee or return the completed form with his trust fund ledgers for the past six months and to file an amended complaint as outlined herein; and CAUTIONS Plaintiff that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/28/22. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nhc)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from clerk, INSD, regarding transfer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jld) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-01565. Original file and docket sheet received. (Returned copy to plaintiff with INND case number) |
| Filing 5 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, on 8/25/2022. (CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/31/2022.] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Transferring Action to Northern District of Indiana; The plaintiff, Ezekiel Taylor, is an inmate currently incarcerated at Miami Correctional Facility. In this action, Mr. Taylor alleges that Judge Michael Gotsch, Sr., "has closed all of [his] complaints without allowing [him] discovery to present evidence" in violation of his First Amendment rights. Dkt. 1. These allegations relate to cases that Mr. Taylor litigated in the South Bend Division of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Mr. Taylor's claims relate to cases he has filed in South Bend, where Magistrate Judge Gotsch presides, a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims in this case occurred in the Northern District. Accordingly, the Court concludes that the interests of justice support transferring this case to the Northern District. Based on the foregoing, the above action is now TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana at South Bend, Indiana. Copy Mailed. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/25/2022. (CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/31/2022.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/31/2022.] |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/31/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL G. GOTSCH, SR., filed by EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR, SR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 letter from IDOC Legal Services, #2 Envelope)(DJH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 8/31/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Gotsch | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ezekiel I Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael G Gotsch, Sr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
