Hampton v. Warden
| Edward M Hampton and Edward Mitchell Hampton |
| Warden |
| MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2022cv00885 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Robert L Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Edward M Hampton. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 11
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Superintendent). Magistrate Consent forms due by 12/27/2022. (slm)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Change of Address by Edward M Hampton from Miami Correctional Facility to Westville Correctional Facility and request for docket sheet. (Docket sheet sent) (kmt)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Sierra A Murray on behalf of Warden (Murray, Sierra)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 12/7/2022, and file a response to the petition with the complete state court record by 1/25/2023. Mr. Hampton's traverse, should he choose to file one, shall be due by 2/28/2023. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 11/17/2022. (ash)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Edward M Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nae)
|
|
***Amended Pleadings Deadline terminated. (nae)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter from Edward M Hampton with Exhibit #11. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (kmt)
|
|
Filing 5
(Previously received) Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Edward M Hampton. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Edward M Hampton. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The court GRANTS the petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 and WAIVES the filing fee; STRIKES the petition #1 ; GRANTS the petitioner until 11/25/2022, to file an amended petition on the correct form; and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by November 25, this case is subject to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 10/24/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Petitioner Edward M Hampton. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 1
**STRICKEN per #3 Order** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Edward M Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Brief and Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition, #2 Appendix Exhibits, #3 Cover letter, #4 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Hampton)(kmt) Modified to strike on 10/24/2022 (nhc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
