National Labor Relations Board v. Medina General Construction LLC
Petitioner: Patricia K Nachand
Respondent: Medina General Construction LLC
Case Number: 4:2018mc00001
Filed: December 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2018 Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING) (rmc)
December 21, 2018 Filing 1 First MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum by Plaintiff National Labor Relations Board. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support of Application, #2 Exhibit Exhibits, #3 Supplement Certificate of Service)(Williams, Raifael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Labor Relations Board v. Medina General Construction LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Patricia K Nachand
Represented By: Raifael W Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Medina General Construction LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?