Bailey v Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: AMANDA BAILEY
Defendant: COMM'R of SOC S ANDREW M. SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 4:2019cv00072
Filed: July 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Jefferson - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Jefferson - AUSA, Sharon)
August 1, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (copy USM)(mrm)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The payment of the filing fee is WAIVED. The US Marshals Service is DIRECTED to effect service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/31/2019. (Copy USM)(mrm)
July 30, 2019 Judge Philip P Simon added. (NEW CASE; IFP PENDING) (ksp)
July 29, 2019 Filing 4 COMPLAINT corrected copy - to replace dkt 1 against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by AMANDA BAILEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Redelman, Jonelle)
July 29, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by 3 copies of summons forms and 3 copies of USM-285 forms by Plaintiff AMANDA BAILEY. (Attachments: #1 Supplement USM285, #2 Proposed Summons)(Redelman, Jonelle)
July 29, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonelle L Redelman on behalf of AMANDA BAILEY (Redelman, Jonelle)
July 29, 2019 Filing 1 *** INCORRECT DOCUMENTS ATTACHED; RE-FILED AT DE 4 *** COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by AMANDA BAILEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement USM 285, #3 Proposed Summons)(Redelman, Jonelle) Modified on 7/30/2019 to add text(ksp).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMM'R of SOC S ANDREW M. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Sharon Jefferson - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMANDA BAILEY
Represented By: Jonelle L Redelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?