Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Sancar Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Plan
Defendant: Sancar Services, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv00038
Filed: June 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, by Sancar Services, Inc..(Hughes, John)
July 27, 2021 Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/2/2021 10:00 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 8/27/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/27/2021. (smb)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/27/2021. (smb)
July 16, 2021 Set Deadline per #6 Agreed Notice. Defendant Sancar Services, Inc answer due by 8/6/2021. (mrm)
July 15, 2021 Filing 6 AGREED NOTICE by Sancar Services, Inc. N.D. Ind. L.R.6-1(B) Notice of Automatic Initial Extension (Hughes, John) Modified on 7/16/2021 to update title (mrm).
July 8, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren K Kroeger on behalf of Sancar Services, Inc. (Kroeger, Lauren)
July 8, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John Edward Hughes on behalf of Sancar Services, Inc. (Hughes, John)
June 16, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sancar Services, Inc.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (jld)
June 16, 2021 Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (jld)
June 15, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul E Stoehr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Stoehr, Paul)
June 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sancar Services, Inc.( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4602670.), filed by Trustees of the Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund, Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CBA 2017-2022, #2 Exhibit B - CBA Signature Page, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Stoehr, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Sancar Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund
Represented By: Paul E Stoehr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Represented By: Paul E Stoehr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund
Represented By: Paul E Stoehr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Plan
Represented By: Paul E Stoehr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sancar Services, Inc.
Represented By: John Edward Hughes
Represented By: Lauren K Kroeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?