Case Number: 1:2005cv01019
Filed: July 12, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 469 ENTRY ON ALL PENDING MOTIONS (see Entry). The court is requesting the Magistrate Judge schedule a conference to determine readiness for trial and to set a prompt trial date. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/19/2009. (PG)
September 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 435 ORDER granting 356 Guy Hensley's Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 358 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 359 Defendants Guy Hensley's and Jim Walter Resources Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 364 Defendants Dennis Seipel's and Action Authority's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/30/08. (TMD)
February 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 352 ORDER denying 215 Motion for default judgment damages. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/8/08. (CLL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KNOWLEDGEAZ, INC. v. DEFOSSET et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?