GEE v. METALDYNE CORPORATION et al
| TIMOTHY D. GEE |
| METALDYNE CORPORATION and METALDYNE NC-M CHASSIS SYSTEMS, LLC |
| 1:2008cv00097 |
| January 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Delaware |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Metaldyne's motion to dismiss Gee's Title VII failure to promote claims based on his August and November 2005 non-promotions is granted. Metaldyne's m otion for summary judgment on Gee's § 1981 failure to promote claims based on those same non-promotions is denied, without prejudice to renewal pending further discovery on whether the promotions Gee sought in August and November 2005 would have amounted to a "new and distinct relationship" for purposes of § 1981 and thus are subject to a two year statute of limitations. If plaintiff has not already served the needed discovery, he shall do so no later than 30 days from the issuance of this entry. Metaldyne's request for oral argument is denied (see entry). Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 11/14/2008. (LBK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
