JOHNSON v. INDIANA GOLDEN GLOVES
Plaintiff: JULIUS JOHNSON
Defendant: INDIANA GOLDEN GLOVES
Case Number: 1:2008cv01061
Filed: August 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: David Frank Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENTRY - The final judgment entered in this action will remain in place and any relief which could be thought to be sought through the filing of 09/18/2008 is denied. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 10/30/2008.(CEB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JOHNSON v. INDIANA GOLDEN GLOVES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JULIUS JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA GOLDEN GLOVES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?