GLASCO v. KNIGHT et al
| CONZALOS GLASCO |
| WENDY KNIGHT, RONDLE ANDERSON, KEVIN MULROONY, CAPTAIN PRULHIERE, KEITH HARTZELL, LIEUTENANT PUCKETT, LIEUTENANT GIBBS, LIEUTENANT WIGGINS, SERGEANT PRUITT, OFFICER TERRY and OFFICER CORNELIUS |
| 1:2008cv01711 |
| December 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Hendricks |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ENTRY: Based on the foregoing discussion, and without any alternative in the matter, the plaintiff's motion to reopen the action 76 is treated as a motion for relief from judgment and as so treated is denied **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/12/2010.(DWH)
|
|
Filing
68
ENTRY: The plaintiff's motion to present evidence 67 is denied, because final judgment was entered in the action on December 2, 2009, because the court ruled on the defendants' motion for summary judgment only after the plaintiff had responded to such motion, and because the present motion does not seek relief based on any of the grounds specified in Rule 60(b) **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/14/2010. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
63
CLOSED JUDGMENT that this cause of action is dismissed without prej cm Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/1/2009.(CBU)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 34 Motion for Injunction; denying as moot 36 Motion to Show the Court Retaliation; denying 19 , 21 , 24 , 28 and 29 Motions asking the court to order prison officials to release him from segregation. See Entry for particulars. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 5/20/2009. c/m. (LBK)
|
|
Filing
30
ENTRY DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. For the reasons discussed herein: Part II: Plaintiff shall have through 4/9/09 in which to report whether at the time his request to proceed in forma pauperis was filed in this action, he was ineligible to proceed in that fashion based on the circumstances described in Part I of this Entry. The action is stayed except as to the directions stated in Part II until plaintiff has proceeded as directed and the court has made any order required by the information which is provided. Consistent with the stay, all pending motions are denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 3/18/2009. c/m. (LBK)
|
|
Filing
4
ENTRY DISCUSSING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $7.63 and shall have through 1/29/09 in whi ch to pay this sum to the Clerk of the District Court. Applying the standards discussed in this Entry, certain claims must be and are dismissed as legally insufficient. The action shall proceed as to the claims not dismissed per this Entry. The cl erk is designated, pursuant to FRCP 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by FRCP 4(d)(1). Process in this case shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 1/8/2009. c/m. (LBK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
