DURDEN v. SEMAFORE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL
| DONALD L. DURDEN |
| CHRISTOPHER J. GARLICH, JOSEPH GARLICH, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 20, PARK FUNDING, LLC and SEMAFORE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
| Cary Ichter and James Joseph Thomas, Ii |
| 1:2010cv00554 |
| May 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
ORDER granting Pltf's 157 Motion to Defer Discovery Responses; granting Pltf's 159 Motion to Defer Discovery Responses (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 11/3/2011. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER granting Pltf's 112 Motion to Amend Complaint; granting Pltf's 117 Motion for Leave to Substitute a Revised Second Amended Complaint. The Court strikes the John Doe Defts, and the caption shall no longer refer to them. Any references in the complaint to John Does shall have no effect, and further filings in this proceeding shall not refer to John Does (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/25/2011. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying w/o prejudice pltf's 100 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 1/14/2011. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
