HALE v. GANNON et al
Plaintiff: DELISA HALE
Defendant: ANNETT HOLDINGS, INC., SCOTT T. GANNON and TMC TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00277
Filed: February 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE: The Plaintiff's motion in limine 50 is GRANTED as to items 2 and 3. The motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as to item 1, DENIED as to item 4, and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT as to item 5 ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/12/2012. (DW)
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE: However, to the extent that the Defendants' motion conflicts with the Court's prior rulings regarding Constance Brown, Dr. Lance Trexler, the Plaintiff's treating physicians, and Dr. Gregory Hale, the Defendants' motion is DENIED. In all other respects, the Defendants' motion is GRANTED ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/11/2012. (DW)
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ENTRY REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DR. GREGORY HALE: For the reasons set forth above, the Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Dr. Hale is DENIED ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/10/2012.(DW)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE AND DAUBERT CHALLENGE TO EXPERT EVIDENCE: For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiff's motion in limine regarding the testimony of Dr. Gregory Hale 45 is DENIED ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/5/2012. (DW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HALE v. GANNON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANNETT HOLDINGS, INC.
Represented By: Lesley A. Pfleging
Represented By: Robert R. Foos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCOTT T. GANNON
Represented By: Robert R. Foos
Represented By: Lesley A. Pfleging
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TMC TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Represented By: Robert R. Foos
Represented By: Lesley A. Pfleging
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DELISA HALE
Represented By: Richard K. Tardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?