B. v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: A. B.
Defendant: RISE SPECIAL SERVICES and FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Counter Claimant: RISE SPECIAL SERVICES and FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Counter Defendant: A. B.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00456
Filed: April 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER - denying 42 Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/28/2013. (CKM)
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, except with regard to the issue of extended school year services, which we DENY AS MOOT as explained above, DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/28/2012. (CKM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: B. v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: RISE SPECIAL SERVICES
Represented By: Seamus P. Boyce
Represented By: Alexander Phillip Pinegar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Represented By: Seamus P. Boyce
Represented By: Alexander Phillip Pinegar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RISE SPECIAL SERVICES
Represented By: Seamus P. Boyce
Represented By: Alexander Phillip Pinegar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Represented By: Seamus P. Boyce
Represented By: Alexander Phillip Pinegar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: A. B.
Represented By: Mitchell M. Pote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A. B.
Represented By: Mitchell M. Pote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?