MELINDA & MARSHA, LLC v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District MELINDA & MARSHA, LLC v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY

MELINDA & MARSHA, LLC v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff:	MELINDA & MARSHA, LLC
Defendant:	THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number:	1:2011cv01128
Filed:	August 17, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 30, 2012	Filing 33 ORDER 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and 29 Motion to Defer Consideration - Cincinnati's motion for summary judgment Dkt. 24 is DENIED without prejudice and with leave to refile. Kidz's motion to defer Dkt. 29 is GRANTED IN PART A ND DENIED IN PART consistent with the discussion in this order. The parties, through their counsel, are ORDERED to appear for a pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Lynch on February 8, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in Room 277, United States Courtho use, the purpose of which will be to define the scope of discovery necessary for Kidz to respond to the arguments advanced in Cincinnati's motion for summary judgment and to set an appropriate schedule for completing it. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/30/2012. (JKS)
August 19, 2011	Filing 6 ORDER - After having reviewed the pleadings, the present record does not establish that complete diversity exists between the parties, as is required.(SEE ORDER). The Court therefore ORDERS the parties to file a joint jurisdictional statement that se ts forth their respective citizenships no later than Friday, August 26, 2011. The jurisdictional statement shall list each member of Plaintiff Melina & Marsha, LLC, and trace the citizenship each members. Additionally, Plaintiff should indicate its p osition regarding Defendant's citizenship allegations. If the parties cannot agree, they shall file separate reports within that time setting forth their respective views of the citizenships of the parties. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/19/2011.(JKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 30, 2012

Filing 33 ORDER 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and 29 Motion to Defer Consideration - Cincinnati's motion for summary judgment Dkt. 24 is DENIED without prejudice and with leave to refile. Kidz's motion to defer Dkt. 29 is GRANTED IN PART A ND DENIED IN PART consistent with the discussion in this order. The parties, through their counsel, are ORDERED to appear for a pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Lynch on February 8, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in Room 277, United States Courtho use, the purpose of which will be to define the scope of discovery necessary for Kidz to respond to the arguments advanced in Cincinnati's motion for summary judgment and to set an appropriate schedule for completing it. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/30/2012. (JKS)

August 19, 2011

Filing 6 ORDER - After having reviewed the pleadings, the present record does not establish that complete diversity exists between the parties, as is required.(SEE ORDER). The Court therefore ORDERS the parties to file a joint jurisdictional statement that se ts forth their respective citizenships no later than Friday, August 26, 2011. The jurisdictional statement shall list each member of Plaintiff Melina & Marsha, LLC, and trace the citizenship each members. Additionally, Plaintiff should indicate its p osition regarding Defendant's citizenship allegations. If the parties cannot agree, they shall file separate reports within that time setting forth their respective views of the citizenships of the parties. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/19/2011.(JKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MELINDA & MARSHA, LLC v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By:	Michael E. Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MELINDA & MARSHA, LLC
Represented By:	Michael L. Schultz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?