ALFREDS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINS & EMPLOYEES
| DANA B. ALFREDS |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINS & EMPLOYEES |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2011cv01274 |
| September 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ENTRY Directing Futher Proceedings - The bundle of documents received from the plaintiff on September 30, 2011, is unintelligible and shall be returned to the plaintiff unfiled. The complaint is dismissed. However, no judgment shall issue at this tim e. Instead, the plaintiff shall have through October 24, 2011, in which to file an amended complaint which has sufficient factual content to state a plausible claim for relief pursuant to the FTCA or on any other or additional legal basis which is wa rranted. Proceedings other than as specified above are stayed until the amended complaint is filed or until the deadline for the filing of an amended complaint has passed. If an amended complaint is filed the court will issue whatever order is warranted. If no amended complaint is filed as directed, the action will be dismissed without further notice. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/3/2011. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
