CERAJESKI v. ZOELLER
Plaintiff: KATHERINE CERAJESKI and CARROLL SCHUNN
Defendant: RICHARD MOURDOCK and GREG ZOELLER
Case Number: 1:2011cv01705
Filed: December 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. The Court GRANTS IN PART Ms. Cerajeski's requests for attorneys' fees, [Filing No. 84; Filing No. 110], and awards her $102,437.50 in attorneys' fees. A Second Amended Final Judgment shall issue accordingly. (See order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/29/2016. (BGT)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 84 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. For the reasons set forth in this ORDER, Ms. Cerajeski's 84 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is DENIED. The Court directs the Clerk to SUBSTITUTE Kelly Mitchell in her offi cial capacity as Treasurer of the State of Indiana for Defendant Daniel Huge in his official capacity as interim Treasurer of the State of Indiana. Final judgment shall issue accordingly. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/26/2015. (BGT)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER ON RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS: The Court directs the Clerk to SUBSTITUTE Daniel Huge in his official capacity as in-terim Treasurer of the State of Indiana for Defendant Richard Mourdock in his official capacity as Treasurer of the State of In diana. For the reasons set forth herein, Ms. Cerajeski's claims are DISMISSED AS MOOT, in light of the State's amendment to the challenged portions of the UPA. Ms. Cerajeski requests that the Court set a briefing schedule for her to reques t attorneys' fees. If after considering the points made by the Court in this order, and consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927, Ms. Cerajeski still believes that she is entitled to attorneys' fees, she is ORDERED to file such a motion within 30 days of the date of this order setting forth the legal basis for her fee request, addressing the points the Court raises, and providing sufficient documentation to support such a request. If she files such a motion, the State has 21 days to file a response, and Ms. Cerajeski has 14 days to file a reply. If Ms. Cerajeski does not file a motion for attorneys' fees within 30 days of this order, the Court will enter final judgment dismissing this case as moot at that time ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/10/2014. C (DW)
November 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting 14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - The Court concludes that Ms. Schunn lacks standing to pursue this action against Defendants and, accordingly, her claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [dkt. 14 ], is GRANTED with respect to Ms. Cerajeski's claims, which are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/8/2012. (JKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CERAJESKI v. ZOELLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KATHERINE CERAJESKI
Represented By: M. Scott Barrett
Represented By: Glenn L. Hara
Represented By: Frederick William Schultz
Represented By: Arthur T. Susman
Represented By: John R. Wylie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARROLL SCHUNN
Represented By: M. Scott Barrett
Represented By: Glenn L. Hara
Represented By: Frederick William Schultz
Represented By: Arthur T. Susman
Represented By: John R. Wylie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD MOURDOCK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GREG ZOELLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?