CERAJESKI v. ZOELLER
KATHERINE CERAJESKI and CARROLL SCHUNN |
RICHARD MOURDOCK and GREG ZOELLER |
1:2011cv01705 |
December 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Denise K. LaRue |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. The Court GRANTS IN PART Ms. Cerajeski's requests for attorneys' fees, [Filing No. 84; Filing No. 110], and awards her $102,437.50 in attorneys' fees. A Second Amended Final Judgment shall issue accordingly. (See order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/29/2016. (BGT) |
Filing 90 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 84 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. For the reasons set forth in this ORDER, Ms. Cerajeski's 84 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is DENIED. The Court directs the Clerk to SUBSTITUTE Kelly Mitchell in her offi cial capacity as Treasurer of the State of Indiana for Defendant Daniel Huge in his official capacity as interim Treasurer of the State of Indiana. Final judgment shall issue accordingly. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/26/2015. (BGT) |
Filing 82 ORDER ON RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS: The Court directs the Clerk to SUBSTITUTE Daniel Huge in his official capacity as in-terim Treasurer of the State of Indiana for Defendant Richard Mourdock in his official capacity as Treasurer of the State of In diana. For the reasons set forth herein, Ms. Cerajeski's claims are DISMISSED AS MOOT, in light of the State's amendment to the challenged portions of the UPA. Ms. Cerajeski requests that the Court set a briefing schedule for her to reques t attorneys' fees. If after considering the points made by the Court in this order, and consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927, Ms. Cerajeski still believes that she is entitled to attorneys' fees, she is ORDERED to file such a motion within 30 days of the date of this order setting forth the legal basis for her fee request, addressing the points the Court raises, and providing sufficient documentation to support such a request. If she files such a motion, the State has 21 days to file a response, and Ms. Cerajeski has 14 days to file a reply. If Ms. Cerajeski does not file a motion for attorneys' fees within 30 days of this order, the Court will enter final judgment dismissing this case as moot at that time ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/10/2014. C (DW) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting 14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - The Court concludes that Ms. Schunn lacks standing to pursue this action against Defendants and, accordingly, her claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [dkt. 14 ], is GRANTED with respect to Ms. Cerajeski's claims, which are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/8/2012. (JKS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.