AUSTRALIAN GOLD LLC v. RUELALA INC Featured Case
Plaintiff: AUSTRALIAN GOLD LLC
Defendant: RUELALA INC
Case Number: 1:2012cv00374
Filed: March 23, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RUELALA INC, filed by AUSTRALIAN GOLD LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt #IP028984 in the amount of $350.00)(AAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AUSTRALIAN GOLD LLC v. RUELALA INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AUSTRALIAN GOLD LLC
Represented By: Charles Johnson Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RUELALA INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?