CARTER v. WARDEN, F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE IN.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District CARTER v. WARDEN, F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE IN.

CARTER v. WARDEN, F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE IN.

Petitioner:	BRIAN CARTER
Respondent:	WARDEN, F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE IN.
Case Number:	1:2012cv00432
Filed:	April 3, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 14, 2012	Filing 11 ORDER denying 10 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration - The petitioner's motion to reconsider 10 is treated as a motion to alter or amend judgment and as so understood is denied. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/14/2012. (copy to Petitioner via US Mail) (JKS)
April 6, 2012	Filing 4 ENTRY Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Carter has sought relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 under circumstances which do not permit or justify the use of that remedy. Because he cannot obtain the review or the relief he seeks in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3), the action must be dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (copy to Petitioner via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/6/2012. (JKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 14, 2012

Filing 11 ORDER denying 10 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration - The petitioner's motion to reconsider 10 is treated as a motion to alter or amend judgment and as so understood is denied. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/14/2012. (copy to Petitioner via US Mail) (JKS)

April 6, 2012

Filing 4 ENTRY Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Carter has sought relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 under circumstances which do not permit or justify the use of that remedy. Because he cannot obtain the review or the relief he seeks in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3), the action must be dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (copy to Petitioner via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/6/2012. (JKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CARTER v. WARDEN, F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE IN.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN, F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE IN.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: BRIAN CARTER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?