MOODY v. LAHOOD et al
Plaintiff: |
GARY W. MOODY |
Defendant: |
MICHAEL B. CLINE, RAY LAHOOD, JOSEPH MCGUINNESS, VICTOR MENDEZ and ROBERT F. TALLY |
Case Number: |
1:2012cv00907 |
Filed: |
July 2, 2012 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Office: |
Indianapolis Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Presiding Judge: |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Nature of Suit: |
Environmental Matters |
Cause of Action: |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 27, 2014 |
Filing
93
CLOSED JUDGMENT-Judgment is entered for the Defendant(s) and against the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff shall take nothing by his complaint. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/27/2014 (copy sent to Gary Moody)(CBU)
|
December 18, 2012 |
Filing
62
ORDER denying 56 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/18/2012 (copy mailed to Gary W. Moody) (CBU)
|
September 25, 2012 |
Filing
48
Entry Discussing Pending Motions - The motion for ruling on pending motions [Dkt. # 31 ] is GRANTED. However, it is noted that the motions referred to in the motion for ruling are in fact not pending and were not pending at the time the moti on was filed. The motion to terminate the screening process in advance of the screening having taken place [Dkt. # 45 ] is DENIED. Moody's NEPA claim must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Federal de fendants, Mr. LaHood and Mr. Tally, are dropped from the action and shall be terminated as parties. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. The plaintiff shall have through October 10, 2012, i n which to file a renewed motion for preliminary injunction. The motion seeking the issuance and service of process [Dkt. # 45] is granted to the extent consistent with the Order issued concurrent with that subject. That is, process shall be issued to defendant Victor Mendez. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/25/2012. Copy Mailed. (JD)
|
September 17, 2012 |
Filing
46
Entry Discussing Motion for Recusal - Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal of Judge Pratt [dkt. 32 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/17/2012. Copy Mailed. (JD)
|
August 31, 2012 |
Filing
40
ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff shall have through 12:00 noon on Friday, September 7, 2012, in which to either seek to drop defendants Tally and Mendez or show cause why they should not be dropped as defendants because Secretary of Transportation LaHood is already a defendant. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/31/2012. Copy Mailed.(JD)
|
July 10, 2012 |
Filing
18
ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff shall have ten (10) working days from the issuance of this Entry, or until July 24, 2012 in which to supplement his complaint by identifying the administrative decision to which he seeks review und er the APA or, if the matter is presented under § 706(1), by identifying the "agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed" and the duty pertaining to such withheld or delayed agency action. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/10/2012. (Copy mailed to Gary Moody)(TRG)
|
July 6, 2012 |
Filing
13
Order (1) Addressing Request to Permit Filing by Fax, (2) Directing Treatment of Documents, (3) Addressing Contact with Court Staff, and (4) Directing Further Proceedings. **SEE ORDER**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/6/2012. Copy Mailed.(JD)
|
July 5, 2012 |
Filing
12
ENTRY AND NOTICE - The court will apply the foregoing standard to the motion for emergency review. The court's ruling will be entered on the docket and the plaintiff notified as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. And of course, plaintiff may also make reasonable inquiry of the clerk's office from time to time to ascertain whether a ruling has been made. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/5/2012.(JD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?