ROCK v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
| Kody Collins, JOHN ROCK and TIM STEWARD |
| NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION |
| 1:2012cv01019 |
| July 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
210
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION - For the aforementioned reasons, the Court DENIES Rock's Motion for Class Certification (Filing No. 104). In addition, the Court DENIES Pugh's Conditional Motion to Intervene (Filing No. 190). (See order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/31/2016. (JLS)
|
|
Filing
209
ORDER - For the reasons stated above, Rock's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Pretrial Order Denying Rebuttal Discovery (Filing No. 200) is OVERRULED. (See order for further information). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/24/2016. (JLS)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY - the Court DENIES the NCAA's motion for leave to file a sur-reply. (Filing No. 196.) However, Mr. Rock is cautioned that any new arguments that may have been raised in the reply, apart from the anticipated expert rebuttal reports, will not be considered by the Court. Finally, the parties should anticipate no further briefing regarding the motion to certify class. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/29/2016. (JLS)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER denying 161 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 2/12/2016. (REO)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S 122 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY. For the reasons explained herein, I conclude that there would have been no basis for me to recuse myself from presiding over Mr. Rock's claims as set forth in the Second Amended Complaint . Because he has been granted leave to file the Third Amended Complaint, however, and because the parties dispute whether any Butler University football players are members of the newly-proposed putative classes and whether Butler University would be substantially affected by the requested injunctive relief, I RECUSE myself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). [Filing No. 122 .] I direct this action be returned to the Office of the Clerk for RANDOM REASSIGNMENT to another District Judge. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/29/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 114 Motion for leave to file Third Amended Class Action Complaint. Plaintiff is ordered to file Third Amended Class Action Complaint within 5 business days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 1/23/2015. (TMD)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER DENYING (90) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 1:12-cv-01019-JMS-DKL: The parties have presented no convincing reason for reassigning Mr. Chamurro's action to the undersigned district judge. Accordingly, the Court determines that reass ignment is not appropriate. For the reasons explained herein, the Court DENIES Mr. Rock's Motion to Consolidate Cases. [Filing No. 90.] The Court directs the Clerk to also docket a copy of this order in Cause No. 1:14-cv-1421-RLY-DML ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/23/2014. (DW)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER - For the reasons stated herein, Mr. Rock's Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(d) to Exclude Portion of the NCAA's Reply Brief or Convert to Motion for Summary Judgment and Allow Discovery is GRANTED IN PART, [ dkt. 54 ], and the NCAA's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED, [dkt. 47 ]. Because the Court did not feel that oral argument was necessary to reach these conclusions, the NCAA's Motion for Oral Argument is DENIED. [Dkt. 49 .] The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge hold a status conference with the parties at her earliest convenience to establish a case management plan. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/16/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Leave to File and denying 43 Motion for Oral Argument - The Court GRANTS Mr. Rock's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. [Dkt. 39 .] The Clerk is directed to docket Mr. Rock's Amended Complai nt, [dkt. 39-1], as the operative complaint in this litigation. The Court DENIES the NCAA's Motion for Oral Argument, [dkt. 43 ], as unnecessary to address the pending motion. The NCAA must answer or otherwise respond to Mr. Rock's amended complaint as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/24/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
38
Order re 21 NCAA's MOTION TO DISMISS - Mr. Collins is dismissed from this action for failing to allege direct antitrust injury. Although the Court concludes that Mr. Rock and Mr. Steward have standing to pursue their claims, the Court G RANTS the NCAA's motion to dismiss. [Dkt. 21.] Plaintiffs' allegations regarding the Division III prohibition on athletics-based financial aid are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' remaining allegations are DISMISSED WITHOUT P REJUDICE. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time. Mr. Rock may move to amend his complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) within 28 days if he can show good cause for doing so. Should he choose to move to amend, the Court ORDERS a review of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/1/2013. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
