PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION v. WAKLEY et al
| PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION and STATE OF INDIANA |
| SAVE OUR VETERANS, INC. and VICTOR WAKLEY |
| JOSEPH B. HORNETT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JAMES BARTEK, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (Counter Defendant) |
| VICTOR WAKLEY (Counterclaimant) |
| 1:2012cv01807 |
| December 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ENTRY - Plaintiff Purdue Research Foundation's Motion to Sever and Remand (Dkt. 11 ) is DENIED. The Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 17 ) of USPS is GRANTED and claims against the IRS in the third-party complaint are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The remainder of the action is REMANDED to the Marion Superior Court. A separate order consistent with the foregoing shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/19/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)
|
|
Filing
23
ENTRY - Save Our Veterans, Inc. has not appeared by counsel and its deadline for doing so has passed, its answer, counterclaim, and third-party complaint are each STRICKEN. Although stricken, these materials shall be kept in the court's file. Those pleadings are not stricken as to Victor Wakley. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/26/2013. Copy Mailed.(JD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
