GUTHRIE v. OBAMA et al
| PAUL A. GUTHRIE |
| JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, MARTIN DEMPSEY, SONIA SOTOMAYOR, UNITED STATES SENATE, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, ELENA KAGAN and ERIC HOLDER |
| 1:2013cv00080 |
| January 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ENTRY - The plaintiff's objection to the assignment of the undersigned 16 is without legal or factual basis and is therefore overruled. The post-judgment motion for relief from judgment, treated as a motion to alter or amend judgment 10 , is denied. An amended complaint was filed after the entry of final judgment. The postjudgment motion for relief from the dismissal of the action has been denied. In light of these circumstances, the amended complaint is of no effect. The case remains closed. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/2/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion seeking disqualification. ***SEE ORDER***.. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/26/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
