VAN TUYL v. ROLLS-ROYCE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN et al
| JAMIE VAN TUYL |
| AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and ROLLS-ROYCE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN |
| 1:2013cv00322 |
| February 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting Defendants' 37 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; and granting 37 Motion for Default Judgment on Defendants' Counterclaim. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter default against Plaintiff on Defendants& #039; counterclaim based on Plaintiff's failure to defend. Once the Clerk has entered a default against Plaintiff, the Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff at her last known address a copy of this order and a copy of the entry of default. Within thir ty days of the entry of default on the docket, Defendants are ordered to submit a motion for default judgment, along with supporting materials, and a proposed default judgment order. If necessary, an evidentiary hearing to determine damages will be set after our review of Defendants' submissions and any response that may be filed by Plaintiff. (S.O.). Copy mailed. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/24/2014. (MAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
