MAXBERRY v. ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District MAXBERRY v. ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE et al

MAXBERRY v. ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE et al

Plaintiff:	DENNIS LEE MAXBERRY
Defendant:	ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
Case Number:	1:2013cv00409
Filed:	March 11, 2013
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 30, 2015	Filing 37 ORDER denying as moot 36 Motion for Judgment, 27 Motion for Injunctive Relief, 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and 34 Motion for Counter Claim and granting 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Mr. Maxberry is entitled to have an opportunity to try to forumulate his grievances in a way that enables the Court to understand his intentions and gives fair notice to the Defendant. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/30/2015 (dist made) (CBU)
March 5, 2014	Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS - Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed for the within stated reasons. Plaintiff is, however, granted leave to file an amended complaint. If he chooses to do so, his amended complaint must not include claims that are encompassed or inextricably intertwined with the Wisconsin judgment, and he must take care to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Plaintiff shall have through and including March 28, 2014, to file his amended complaint. If he does not comply with this deadline, a final judgment in favor of Defendant shall issue. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/5/2014. Copy Mailed. (JD)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 30, 2015

Filing 37 ORDER denying as moot 36 Motion for Judgment, 27 Motion for Injunctive Relief, 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and 34 Motion for Counter Claim and granting 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Mr. Maxberry is entitled to have an opportunity to try to forumulate his grievances in a way that enables the Court to understand his intentions and gives fair notice to the Defendant. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/30/2015 (dist made) (CBU)

March 5, 2014

Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS - Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed for the within stated reasons. Plaintiff is, however, granted leave to file an amended complaint. If he chooses to do so, his amended complaint must not include claims that are encompassed or inextricably intertwined with the Wisconsin judgment, and he must take care to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Plaintiff shall have through and including March 28, 2014, to file his amended complaint. If he does not comply with this deadline, a final judgment in favor of Defendant shall issue. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/5/2014. Copy Mailed. (JD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAXBERRY v. ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
Represented By:	Todd A. Dixon
Represented By:	T. Joseph Wendt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: DENNIS LEE MAXBERRY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?