SHERA v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA et al

Defendant: ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA and ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES INC. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Plaintiff: AMANDA SHERA
Case Number: 1:2013cv00684
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Referring Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHERA v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIANA
Represented By: Ada W. Dolph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES INC. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Represented By: Ada W. Dolph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMANDA SHERA
Represented By: Bridget L. O'Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.