BELL v. ARRUDA

BELL v. ARRUDA

Plaintiff:	RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:	MARK ARRUDA
Case Number:	1:2013cv00800
Filed:	May 15, 2013
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Copyright
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 12, 2014	Filing 13 ENTRY and Notice - Based on the foregoing, it is evident that the Court should not have ruled on the Rule 12(b)(6) portion of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 6 ). That ruling is now RESCINDED, and as a result, (1) Part III.C. of the Entry issued on May 7, 2014 is VACATED, and (2) the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Amended Judgment consistent with this Entry and Notice shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/12/2014.(TRG)
March 7, 2014	Filing 11 ENTRY on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - Mr. Arruda's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 6 ) is GRANTED. Mr. Bell's claims against Mr. Arruda are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/7/2014. (TRG)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 12, 2014

Filing 13 ENTRY and Notice - Based on the foregoing, it is evident that the Court should not have ruled on the Rule 12(b)(6) portion of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 6 ). That ruling is now RESCINDED, and as a result, (1) Part III.C. of the Entry issued on May 7, 2014 is VACATED, and (2) the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Amended Judgment consistent with this Entry and Notice shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/12/2014.(TRG)

March 7, 2014

Filing 11 ENTRY on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - Mr. Arruda's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 6 ) is GRANTED. Mr. Bell's claims against Mr. Arruda are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/7/2014. (TRG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BELL v. ARRUDA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD N. BELL
Represented By:	Richard N. Bell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MARK ARRUDA
Represented By:	David F. Hurley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?