PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. COMMISSIONER, et al.
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC. |
| COMMISSIONER, INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and PROSECUTOR, TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA |
| 1:2013cv01335 |
| August 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER denying State's 95 Motion for Relief from Judgment. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/2/2015. (BGT)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: The Court GRANTS IN PART PPINK's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 71]. The Court DENIES the State's Motion for Summary Judgment in all respects. [Filing No. 73.] No final judgment shall issue at this time (see Order for details). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/3/2014. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting in part 7 PPINK's Motion for Preliminary Injunction - The Court ISSUES A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d), such that the Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys are enjoined from enforcing Indiana Code § 16-18-2-1.5(a)(2 ) against PPINK's Lafayette clinic. PPINK need not post a bond, given that the State does not dispute PPINK's assertion that the State will not incur monetary damages from this injunction. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/26/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER: Because the IDOH has not yet acted on PPINK's application or waiver requests, there is currently no indication whether PPINK's Lafayette clinic will be considered an "abortion clinic" on January 1, 2014, I.C. § 16-18 -2-1.5(a), such that it would be subject to the surgical-related physical plant requirements that it contends it does not currently meet. But this uncertainty is not due to delay on PPINK's part, considering that it filed its application and wai ver requests within two weeks of the effective dates of the challenged statutes. PPINK's application and waiver requests have been pending before the IDOH for almost four months, and it is undisputed that the challenged statutes modify the defin ition and regulation of what is an "abortion clinic" in a way that could impact PPINK's Lafayette clinic in approximately seven weeks. Given this time frame, the Court ORDERS the State to file a report by November 13, 2013, detailing t he status of PPINK's abortion clinic application and waiver requests, why those requests have not yet been ruled on, the average amount of time it has taken the IDOH to rule on similar requests, and when the IDOH anticipates ruling on PPINK's pending requests ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/8/2013.(DW) Modified on 11/8/2013 (DW).
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER - On October 11, 2013, the Defendants filed a Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and a First Stipulation of the Parties. [Dkts. 37 ; 38 .] Two issues with those filings require the Court's attention. The Defendants' response brief, the stipulation, and all exhibits attached to those filings were filed under seal without a motion requesting to do so. The Defendants' description of the exhibits attached to their brief does not facilitate t he Court's review. For the reasons detailed herein, the Court ORDERS the Defendants to file an Amended Response Brief by noon on October 17, 2013. The Plaintiff's reply deadline remains October 18, 2013, and a hearing remains set for October 30, 2013. ***SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION*** Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/15/2013. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
