KAMIN v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
| DANIEL G. KAMIN |
| TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY |
| 1:2013cv01593 |
| October 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER TO FILE AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT: For these reasons, the Court STRIKES Travelers' Third-Party Complaint, [Filing No. 21], and ORDERS it to file an Amended Third-Party Complaint by April 15, 2014, properly pleading a basis for this Court's jurisdiction over that claim. The third-party defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Travelers' Amended Third-Party Complaint as contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties are cautioned to carefully r espond to Travelers' jurisdictional allegations to avoid this Court having to issue a third jurisdictional entry in this case. Additionally, Travelers suggests that its name is actually The Standard Fire Insurance Company. [Filing No. 21 at 1.] The parties should conduct whatever investigation is necessary and file a joint motion to correct Travelers' name, should such correction be necessary ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/8/2014.(DW)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Travelers' Motion to Dismiss, [Filing No. 6], is DENIED, and Travelers' Request for Oral Argument, [Filing No. 8], is DENIED ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/6/2014. (DW)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint jurisdictional statement by October 21, 2013, certifying the parties' citizenship and that the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeded $75,000 at the time of removal. If the parties cannot agree on the parties' citizenship, the amount in controversy, or any other jurisdictional requirement, they are ordered to file competing jurisdictional statements by that date setting forth their positions. A compliant statement will relieve Plaintiff of his obligations under Local Rule 81.1 ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/8/2013.(DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KAMIN v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth C. Newa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DANIEL G. KAMIN | |
| Represented By: | Christopher J. Braun |
| Represented By: | Gregory M. Gotwald |
| Represented By: | Sean M. Hirschten |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
