COOPER v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

COOPER v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

Plaintiff:	THOMAS E. COOPER
Defendant:	CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Case Number:	1:2013cv01741
Filed:	October 30, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2015	Filing 90 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth above, Verizon is entitled to summary judgment on Cooper's claim and its motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 49) accordingly is GRANTED. The Plaintiff� 39;s Motion to Amend Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to Label Statement of Material Facts in Dispute Pursuant to Local Rule (Dkt. No. 81) is DENIED as unnecessary *SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/30/2015. (DW)
September 28, 2015	Filing 89 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL: This cause is before the Court on motions to seal filed by both Plaintiff and Defendant. [Filing Nos. 52, 64.] Filing No. 52 is granted in part and denied in part, and Filing No.64 remains under advisement pending the parties' supplemental filing (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 9/28/2015. (SWM)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2015

Filing 90 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth above, Verizon is entitled to summary judgment on Cooper's claim and its motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 49) accordingly is GRANTED. The Plaintiff� 39;s Motion to Amend Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to Label Statement of Material Facts in Dispute Pursuant to Local Rule (Dkt. No. 81) is DENIED as unnecessary ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/30/2015. (DW)

September 28, 2015

Filing 89 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL: This cause is before the Court on motions to seal filed by both Plaintiff and Defendant. [Filing Nos. 52, 64.] Filing No. 52 is granted in part and denied in part, and Filing No.64 remains under advisement pending the parties' supplemental filing (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 9/28/2015. (SWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COOPER v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Represented By:	Matthew J. Kelley
Represented By:	Bonnie L. Martin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS E. COOPER
Represented By:	Michael J. Alerding
Represented By:	Julia E. Dimick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?