BUNCH v. FRANK et al
| KRISTINE BUNCH |
| BRYAN FRANK and JAMES SKAGGS |
| 1:2014cv00438 |
| March 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 54(b) - This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Dkt. No. 72 ). The motion is fully briefed and t he Court, being duly advised, GRANTS the motion. Judgment in favor of the United States will be entered this date. The case shall proceed against the remaining Defendants. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/6/2017. (BRR)
|
|
Filing
65
ENTRY ON UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Accordingly, the United States' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Bunch's claims against the United States ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/28/2016. (DW)
|
|
Filing
59
ENTRY ON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: This cause is before the Court on the United States of America's Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 13 in Cause No. 1:15-cv-160-RLY-TAB (S.D. Ind. Filed Feb. 5, 2015)). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is DENIED, and the Court hereby gives notice to Bunch that it will be considering the United States' alternative mo tion for summary judgment. As requested, the Court will allow Bunch time to conduct limited discovery into this issue and to properly respond. Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to confer with each other and file a notice with the Court within fourteen days outlining an agreed-upon timeframe to conduct the necessary discovery and a suggested briefing schedule. If the parties cannot agree, they should request a conference with Magistrate Judge LaRue. The consolidated case re mains STAYED pending a ruling on the United States' motion. As such, the Court expects the parties to work together in an expeditious manner ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/29/2015.(DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
