WILSON-TRATTNER v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
||JENNIFER R. WILSON-TRATTNER
||BRAD BURKHART, ROBERT CAMPBELL, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY, INDIANA, TED MUNDEN, SCOTT E. ROEGER and MIKE SHEPHERD
||June 27, 2014
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Debra McVicker Lynch
||Larry J. McKinney
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 18, 2016
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Defendants Robert Campbell, Ted Munden, Sheriff Michael Shepherd, and Brad Burkhart on all of Plaintiff Jennifer R. Wilson-Trattne r's claims against them in any capacity; GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Defendant Scott E. Roeger on Plaintiff Jennifer R. Wilson-Trattner's claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and DENIES summary judgment on Plaintiff Jennifer R. Wilson Trattner's battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against Defendant Scott E. Roeger, to the extent such was sought. The Court hereby sets this matter for a Telephonic Status Conference with the remaining par ties for Wednesday, June 1, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. EDT, at which time the remaining parties (Jennifer R. Wilson-Trattner and Scott E. Roeger) shall appear by counsel to discuss resolution of the remaining claims by calling the Court's Conference Bridge, 317-229-3960. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 5/18/2016. (GSO)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?